
44:57
I thought that registering for the retreat gave us the option to indicate that we were also joining DECO, and we could pay there?

45:05
(At the retreat)

45:35
I was under that impression as well

47:00
Ok thanks, still not sure if we have to fill out another form in advance but I will ask Rebecca

47:38
That would be helpful to know—about the registration options.

49:04
For those that paid for their DECO membership prior to the Retreat will not need to complete any form during the Retreat. I will have a list of those individuals.

49:12
Is CCCDECO taking a position on the online college?

49:58
No need to fill out another form, as I understand it, if you plan to pay at the retreat

50:32
@Dan - no. We have not polled or voted on that as DECs but perhaps we can talk about that after the presentation at the retreat?

50:42
For those paying their membership at the Retreat, a membership form will be available at the Retreat in case they have not completed one.

51:03
Ok, thanks Rebecca

52:14
I wonder if DECO might want to consider having someone from ASCCC present at the retreat as well about the 115th online college?

52:29
Yes. Still some reverb.

53:26
@Jim - well, since it’s really a DEC retreat I’m not sure that would be appropriate, though I’d be happy to have someone report on the ASCCC view

53:55
Yes, I guess that’s what I mean - if we are giving time for the CO POV it seems like we should give time for “the other side"

54:00
@CCC DECO: Thanks. College 115 is controversial among some constituencies....

55:01
I definitely understand it’s controversial. The idea is only to have the CO talk about whatever details they can share. Opinions about it would/could be a whole different conversation

57:11
If the CO talk is opinion-free that will be amazing!

57:26
@Jim - I could ask them not to come

57:58
I think it’s really important that CCC DECO have a full discussion about it. This is huge. I just think it would be good to have a full discussion, opinions and all

58:15
How is the 6M going to be handled?

58:20
For OER

58:24
I understand and agree, just not sure how to build that into a very full agenda

01:01:00
I don't think we are still working out the details of the 6M for OER as the May Revise was so new. I will have to check on that and get back to the group.

01:01:42
Oops! I mean: We are still working out the details!

01:06:26
Question for Rebecca: Has enforcing the “Anonymous” setting on all Canvas LTIs resulted in any surprises for faculty or students n the functionality of those LTIs?

01:10:39
Yeah thanks

01:12:06
How to chech that Pearson m aterial is accessible?

01:16:51
Foothill finishes fastest!

01:17:02
rebecca.pang@cerrocoso.edu

01:17:13
LOL!

01:17:42
To be clear: this tool only works for summer classes, correct?

01:17:48
Correct

01:18:16
Thanks!

01:19:47
Some courses are NOt quality or accessibiloty reviewed?

01:19:55
what data are they accessing from the CCCs? (how are they getting our course info)?

01:20:05
Visit our landing page - https://foothill.edu/onlinelearning/students/oei-course-exchange.html

01:21:41
hhow does reate to the course exchange?

01:21:58
relate [sorry - bad typist]

01:22:15
Is the plan to expand this beyond summer classes eventually? Or is the design to keep it (mostly) limited to summer?

01:23:10
What is an example fo 'publicaly available'?

01:23:41
how do we submit courses?

01:23:43
To see a demo, visit https://www.quottly.com/

01:24:48
Most data is in our SIS ...

01:25:32
Thanks for updating that :-)

01:25:45
oops, Quottly site has some accessibility errors according to WAVE

01:26:27
Great idea on the icon for accessibility reviewed!

01:27:45
Very cool! thank you!

01:28:09
Sorry if this was addressed, but can people view the exchange classes in this system?

01:28:13
Kate Jordahl, Director of Operations

01:28:33
kjordahl@ccconlineed.org

01:29:42
Got it. Thanks.

01:30:13
Thank you.

01:30:50
Thanks everyone!

01:30:58
Thanks!

01:31:15
Thanks!