I thought that registering for the retreat gave us the option to indicate that we were also joining DECO, and we could pay there?

(At the retreat)

I was under that impression as well

Ok thanks, still not sure if we have to fill out another form in advance but I will ask Rebecca

That would be helpful to know—about the registration options.

For those that paid for their DECO membership prior to the Retreat will not need to complete any form during the Retreat. I will have a list of those individuals.

Is CCCDECO taking a position on the online college?

No need to fill out another form, as I understand it, if you plan to pay at the retreat

@Dan - no. We have not polled or voted on that as DECs but perhaps we can talk about that after the presentation at the retreat?

For those paying their membership at the Retreat, a membership form will be available at the Retreat in case they have not completed one.

Ok, thanks Rebecca

I wonder if DECO might want to consider having someone from ASCCC present at the retreat as well about the 115th online college?

Yes. Still some reverb.

@Jim - well, since it’s really a DEC retreat I’m not sure that would be appropriate, though I’d be happy to have someone report on the ASCCC view

Yes, I guess that’s what I mean - if we are giving time for the CO POV it seems like we should give time for “the other side"

@CCC DECO: Thanks. College 115 is controversial among some constituencies....

I definitely understand it’s controversial. The idea is only to have the CO talk about whatever details they can share. Opinions about it would/could be a whole different conversation

If the CO talk is opinion-free that will be amazing!

@Jim - I could ask them not to come

I think it’s really important that CCC DECO have a full discussion about it. This is huge. I just think it would be good to have a full discussion, opinions and all

How is the 6M going to be handled?

For OER

I understand and agree, just not sure how to build that into a very full agenda

I don't think we are still working out the details of the 6M for OER as the May Revise was so new. I will have to check on that and get back to the group.

Oops! I mean: We are still working out the details!

Question for Rebecca: Has enforcing the “Anonymous” setting on all Canvas LTIs resulted in any surprises for faculty or students n the functionality of those LTIs?

Yeah thanks

How to chech that Pearson m aterial is accessible?

Foothill finishes fastest!

rebecca.pang@cerrocoso.edu

LOL!

To be clear: this tool only works for summer classes, correct?

Correct

Thanks!

Some courses are NOt quality or accessibiloty reviewed?

what data are they accessing from the CCCs? (how are they getting our course info)?

Visit our landing page - https://foothill.edu/onlinelearning/students/oei-course-exchange.html

hhow does reate to the course exchange?

relate [sorry - bad typist]

Is the plan to expand this beyond summer classes eventually? Or is the design to keep it (mostly) limited to summer?

What is an example fo 'publicaly available'?

how do we submit courses?

To see a demo, visit https://www.quottly.com/

Most data is in our SIS ...

Thanks for updating that :-)

oops, Quottly site has some accessibility errors according to WAVE

Great idea on the icon for accessibility reviewed!

Very cool! thank you!

Sorry if this was addressed, but can people view the exchange classes in this system?

Kate Jordahl, Director of Operations

kjordahl@ccconlineed.org

Got it. Thanks.

Thank you.

Thanks everyone!

Thanks!

Thanks!